Sign-up to a data breach claim today - use our quick and easy form to begin your claim for thousands of pounds in compensation.
Former GP Dr Thair Altaii was found guilty of voyeurism at Newcastle Crown Court earlier this year. Over 19,000 images of women were found in his possession.
The 55-year-old former “trusted family doctor” was caught with the images and video footage after a patient raised concerns about being recorded. During her appointment, she’d noticed two mobile phones propped up; one facing a chair, and the other facing the examination table. Police were informed, and after Dr Altaii initially denied having any such material in his possession after arrest, a shocking discovery was later found when his laptop was seized.
Here, we’ll look at this in terms of legal advice for a data protection claim.
The jury verdict in the case of Dr Thair Altaii was swiftly received. After three charges were brought by two women – all of which he denied – he was found guilty of voyeurism during the period of 2008 to 2014.
Dr Thair Altaii had initially denied taking any such images or footage at all. He then, in a prepared statement, accepted recording a small number of videos without consent. He labelled this as an “error of judgment” and pleaded that the material was for training and assessment purposes.
The jury disagreed. With over 19,000 images of women found – some clothed, and some in various stages of undress – the guilty verdict is hardly surprising. This aspect certainly helps to support a data breach claim.
The fact that there was no consent for footage and images to be taken means Dr Thair Altaii has no real defence in terms of that angle for a claim.
Even if his arguments that he was taking footage for training and assessment purposes instead of for some form of sexual gratification had have worked, there was no consent. In the criminal case, the women involved were asked if they had consented to images and footage being taken. Both were clear in confirming they hadn’t.
Dr Thair Altaii ultimately abused his duty of trust in taking images and footage without consent (voyeurism charges aside).
Doctor-patient confidentiality is so important. Ultimately, this remains a far more sinister case given the charges Dr Thair Altaii was convicted for.
Victims in this case have a clear right of redress for what has happened. Anyone who has been affected by this case can contact our legal team for free, no-obligation and confidential help.
The content of this post/page was considered accurate at the time of the original posting and/or at the time of any posted revision. The content of this page may, therefore, be out of date. The information contained within this page does not constitute legal advice. Any reliance you place on the information contained within this page is done so at your own risk.
EasyJet admits data of nine million hacked
British Airways data breach: How to claim up to £6,000 compensation
Are you owed £5,000 for the Virgin Media data breach?
Virgin Media faces £4.5 BILLION in compensation payouts
BA customers given final deadline to claim compensation for data breach
Shoppers slam Morrisons after loyalty points stolen
Half a million customers can sue BA over huge data breach
Lawyers accuse BA of 'swerving responsibility' for data breach
The biggest data breaches of 2020
Fill out our quick call back form below and we'll contact you when you're ready to talk to us.